In March 2020, The DHS Program released a call for applications for the 2020 DHS Data Processing Procedures – Data Tabulation and Data Finalization (DPPII) workshop, to be held in Accra, Ghana in June. The DPPII workshop includes online pre-work and face-to-face instruction. DHS Program Data Processing staff members assist participants through one-on-one coaching, and participants gain proficiency through hands-on practice. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, this in-person workshop was canceled.
The DHS Program’s Data Processing team worked with the Capacity Strengthening team to adapt the DPPII workshop to an online course focused on data tabulation. The course was delivered on The DHS Program Learning Hub and included self-paced modules with readings, videos, and activities, as well as updated CSPro manuals. These up-to-date materials will be used in future data processing courses and workshops, plus trainings for new Data Processing staff at The DHS Program.
The restructured DPPII course is semi-synchronous, including eLearning modules and assignments that participants work through independently. The course also includes four virtual instructor-led sessions, in which participants and DHS Program facilitators login to the same virtual learning space to learn new content, watch presentations, ask and address questions, and receive feedback on assignments in real-time. For their capstone assignment, participants recreate a standard DHS table using CSPro by defining their own variables and data.
Staff from implementing agencies in countries with ongoing DHS surveys are targeted for participation in the DPPII workshop, as participants build competencies required to process DHS data and produce country-specific tables found in DHS final reports. For this first-ever virtual DPPII course, participants included five women and fourteen men from eight Anglophone countries which recently implemented a DHS survey: the Gambia, Ghana, Liberia, Nigeria, Pakistan, Rwanda, Uganda, and Zambia.
What Participants Say
“I’m glad to have been part of this training. [It gave me a] better understanding of the use of DHS data, generation of DHS recode and tables. I hope to practice my new skills with the country-specific tables.”
“Attending training and combining with other duties from work was not helpful but I will take time and continue reading and finish all as they are clear and useful.”
Converting face-to-face workshops to virtual learning sessions comes with challenges. It can be difficult for participants to balance coursework with work and other responsibilities, which is not an issue with in-person residential workshops. Throughout the virtual DPPII training, it became clear that more one-on-one instruction time was needed. To address this, facilitators began holding optional office hours. These and other lessons learned about virtual facilitation will be applied to future online courses, remote technical assistance, and webinars.
Interested in learning more about capacity strengthening opportunities at The DHS Program? The DHS Program periodically makes Workshop and Training Announcements for upcoming training opportunities.
This blog post is part of Luminare, our blog series exploring innovative solutions to data collection, quality assurance, biomarker measurement, data use, and further analysis.
The DHS Program recently published a Methodological Report providing a framework for estimating “level-weights” in DHS surveys – weights that correspond to each stage of sampling. These weights are required for multilevel modeling. While the audience for the framework itself is academic researchers, the challenge of protecting respondent confidentiality while supporting data analysis is of general interest.
We sat down with two of the authors, Mahmoud Elkasabi, Senior Sampling Statistician, and Tom Pullum, Senior Advisor for Research and Analysis, to learn more about this innovative strategy.
How did the idea for this activity come about?
Post from Data User:
I have been reading the posts on the forum regarding the use of weights with multilevel analyses and wanted to check to see if there were any updates on recommendations on how to go about this. . . Since we cannot separate out the household weights from the cluster weights to incorporate them in the statistical coding, does the DHS have any recommendations on how to go about running multilevel models with DHS data? . . . I would like to run multilevel models looking at childhood vaccinations and want to make sure I am going about it in the most proper way. Any help or guidance on this from those at DHS or out in the forum would be greatly appreciated!
Mahmoud: There has been huge user demand for DHS survey level-weights. We have seen many posts on The DHS Program User Forum over the years, where analysts are trying to apply weights in multilevel analysis. It is a common type of research question, to use multilevel modeling to understand the effects of cluster-level characteristics such as region on individual-level outcomes, such as contraceptive use or children’s nutritional status.
For those of us who aren’t statistically inclined, why do researchers need to include sampling weights in their analysis?
Mahmoud: Sampling weights compensate for different probabilities of selection within the samples, and for different levels of non-response. Providing weights at multiple levels allows for the best level of representativeness for that unit. That is, the data from each interviewed woman becomes as representative as possible of similar women in the population. That is ultimately the goal of a survey: to obtain data that are nationally and subnationally representative without interviewing the entire population.
Why aren’t level-weights standardly provided with DHS datasets?
Mahmoud: After a survey is completed, The DHS Program destroys the information required for exact calculation of the cluster weights. Providing the true cluster-level weight for each cluster would pose a risk to respondent confidentiality—anyone with access to the sampling frame could use the cluster-level weights to identify the specific clusters that were drawn in the sample—and then, potentially, identify households or individuals. For that reason, The DHS Program only releases the final survey weights in the datasets.
How does the level-weights framework respond to the challenge of protecting confidentiality?
Tom: We propose a framework that uses publicly available data from DHS datasets and Final Reports, along with a process to estimate other inputs. The framework starts with the household final weight from the household recode file or the woman final weight from the woman recode file. Most of the numbers required to separate the final weight into a cluster-level weight and a household-level (or woman-level) weight are included in the data files or in Appendix A – Sample Design of DHS Final Reports. Some of the required information is not available there (see Table 1), but we provide guidance on how to estimate these inputs with other publicly available data. In this way, we can estimate or approximate the level-weights for the clusters and households (or women).
Have these level-weights been used in any DHS analysis?
Tom: This report shows how to use data from the 2015 Zimbabwe DHS to estimate level-weights and then include them in a multilevel regression model. We fitted several regression models with data for married women in 400 clusters to examine modern contraceptive use with age, education, residence, and number of children as covariates. We provide the STATA code for this example.
The recently released Analytical Study Contraceptive Use, Method Mix, and Method Availabilityis the first DHS research to use the proposed methodology. This analysis used the method described here to estimate cluster-level and woman-level weights and then to assess the effect of cluster-level and woman-level factors on contraceptive use in Haiti and Malawi.
Dr. Mahmoud Elkasabi is a Sampling Statistician at The DHS Program. He joined The DHS Program in 2013 after earning his Ph.D in Survey Methodology from the University of Michigan at Ann Arbor, with a specialty in Survey Statistics and Sampling. Dr. Elkasabi is responsible for the sampling design for the DHS surveys as well as building sampling capacity in many countries, such as Ghana, Egypt, Nigeria, India, Malawi, Zambia, Bangladesh, and Afghanistan. Dr. Elkasabi likes to work closely with the sampling statisticians in different countries. In these win-win relationships, he shares his knowledge in sampling and gains new knowledge & experiences.
Dr. Tom Pullum directs the research program, including the analysis of DHS data beyond the country reports, such as the analytical studies, comparative reports, further analysis studies, and methodological reports. He also has overall responsibility for The DHS Fellows Program and workshops. Current interests include maternal mortality and the measurement of child vulnerability. A continuing effort is the adaptation of demographic methods to statistical frameworks and software. His work with DHS has included methodological reports on data quality. He joined the DHS staff in 2011, following a lengthy career in academia, primarily at the University of Texas at Austin. Dr. Pullum has a Ph.D. in sociology from the University of Chicago.
Languages spoken: French, Spanish, a little Swahili, a word or two in Arabic, a touch of Portuguese
When did you start at The DHS Program? I was hired in 1999 as the first GIS Analyst after completing my master’s degree in Population Geography. The DHS Program at that time had just started collecting GPS data. I established the first protocol and manual for the collection of GPS data which remains part of the core survey methodology today.
I grew in that role until 2006. I wanted to learn more and be able to do more, so I went back to pursue my Doctorate in Public Health at Harvard School of Public Health. Following that, I became the Director of Research for the Center for Population and Development Studies at Harvard for five years before returning to The DHS Program in May 2019.
What is your role at The DHS Program? My role as Deputy Director is to translate all of our day to day survey work into the big picture in The DHS Program. Specifically, the country work falls under me, so I try to keep up-to-date on what’s happening in all the surveys all the time.
I also bring an outside perspective to the program. Having been away from The DHS Program for a number of years, I feel like I have a better perspective of what the community of DHS data users cares about and how people value and use the data, while at the same time understanding how the extraordinary work is achieved with all of our partners.
COVID-19 has affected all ongoing DHS surveys in one way or another. We have postponed a number of surveys that were supposed to take place this year, and we have shifted to virtual technical assistance where we can. The country demand for DHS surveys has not decreased, so I am closely monitoring when we will be able to resume field activities. For the latest updates on COVID-19 from The DHS Program, visit the new COVID-19 feature page.
What’s your favorite trip to date? One trip I enjoyed was to Cambodia in 2005. We had completed the 2005 Cambodia DHS and were in the planning stages for the next DHS survey. I traveled with Bernard Barrère, the previous Deputy Director. He was working on the new survey design, and I was teaching a workshop to staff from the Ministry of Health and Ministry of Planning on using GIS to combine their health information system data with DHS to explore some of the findings in the DHS survey. Bernard and I took little motorcycles to dinner at a very nice French restaurant together. That’s a nice memory I have of the previous Deputy Director.
What work are you most proud of? Working with country counterparts to develop and carry out the surveys. I loved teaching workshops, seeing when participants get what you are trying to teach them. Capacity strengthening was always part of The DHS Program, but it has grown tremendously and is now a formalized effort through The DHS Program Learning Hub for instance.
What developments in data collection or global health, in general, are you excited about right now? Biomarkers. DHS surveys always collect data about people’s demographic and health histories, but there are many health conditions and risk factors that we can measure directly, such as testing for malaria, hemoglobin levels, micronutrients, and things we have yet to consider that can provide additional information to help us understand health and population change.
Even though COVID-19 has paused survey fieldwork and kept DHS Program staff from traveling, DHS data continue to inform the COVID-19 conversation around the world. The just-launched COVID-19 feature page on The DHS Program website provides a hub for all of this essential information.
This new page features the tools released this year by The DHS Program to support the use of DHS COVID-19-related data:
Our story map on availability of handwashing facilities and sleeping space allows users to explore national and subnational variation in these infection-prevention measures.
SPA data on health facility readiness to manage infection control, diagnose respiratory infections, and provide treatment were compiled in a new publication.
The global community relies on DHS data in their work to understand COVID-19, and we are eager to share those resources. The new web hub provides frequently updated news and journal articles that feature DHS data. These articles highlight the broad impact of COVID-19. The effects of lockdowns, social distancing, and isolation are far-reaching and have caused great concern in the global health community. DHS data help to contextualize these other effects of the pandemic: food insecurity in Nepal, concerns about the impact of COVID-19 on family planning use in Nigeria, and an increase in domestic violence in the Philippines are just a few examples. The journal articles feed lists COVID-19-related peer-reviewed journal articles that use DHS data. Recently posted articles cover the public health consequences of COVID-19 on malaria in Africa (Nature Medicine), preventing COVID-19 in Indian slums (World Medical and Health Policy), and a vulnerability index for COVID-19 in India (Lancet Global Health).
Finally, the COVID-19 feature page will be home to any COVID-19-related press releases issued by The DHS Program. This is where you can find more detailed information about the status of survey operations, including plans for returning to the field and adjusted survey timelines.
In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, The DHS Program has paused in-person survey trainings and activities. Recognizing the desire for opportunities to showcase new survey results despite global stay-at-home orders and social distancing guidelines, The DHS Program has devised virtual dissemination strategies for surveys.
In observation of World Mosquito Day 2020, learn more about these two MIS surveys conducted in Uganda and Ghana.
2018-19 Uganda Malaria Indicator Survey (UMIS)
To commemorate World Malaria Day 2020, the Uganda National Malaria Control Division (NMCD), Uganda Bureau of Statistics (UBOS), the US President’s Malaria Initiative (PMI) Uganda, and The DHS Program virtually disseminated the 2018-19 UMIS on April 23, 2020. Dr. Jimmy Opigo, Ministry of Health Assistant Commissioner and head of the NMCD, welcomed the global, virtual audience, and technical remarks were made by James Muwonge of UBOS and Dr. Mame K. Niang of PMI Uganda. More than 100 participants attended the webinar that included a presentation of the 2018-19 UMIS key findings and discussion about the survey results.
“COVID-19 doesn’t lock down mosquitos. Mosquitos aren’t in a quarantine.”
DR. JIMMY OPIGO, UGANDA MINISTRY OF HEALTH, ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER AND HEAD OF THE UGANDA NMCD
About the survey: The 2018-19 UMIS interviewed 8,351 households and 8,231 women age 15-49. The 2018-19 UMIS was implemented by NMCD and UBOS. Financial support for the survey was provided by the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) through the PMI, United Kingdom Department for International Development (DFID), Government of Uganda with Global Fund support, and World Health Organization (WHO).
2019 Ghana Malaria Indicator Survey (GMIS)
The 2019 GMIS was implemented by the Ghana Statistical Service (GSS) in close collaboration with the Ghana National Malaria Control Programme (NMCP) and the National Public Health Reference Laboratory (NPHRL) of the Ghana Health Service (GHS). On July 28, 2020, the 2019 GMIS results were virtually disseminated during a webinar.
Professor Kwadwo Ansah Koram, former Director of the Noguchi Memorial Institute for Medical Research, chaired the webinar. Professor Samuel Kobina Annim, Government Statistician of GSS, thanked the survey teams for their commitment to collecting high quality, accurate data. Dr. Keziah L. Malm, Programme Manager of NMCP, provided an overview of malaria control strategies. US Ambassador to Ghana Stephanie S. Sullivan spoke of the collaboration between the US and the government of Ghana to improve malaria treatment, control, and prevention. Representatives from GSS and NMCP presented the results of the 2019 GMIS and facilitated a Q&A discussion about the implications of the survey findings. An additional webinar for the media was produced, highlighting GMIS survey findings and data use tools.
About the survey: The 2019 GMIS provides up-to-date estimates of basic demographic and health indicators for malaria at the national level, for urban and rural areas, and for each of the 10 former administrative regions. A total of 5,181 women age 15-49 were interviewed, representing a response rate of 99%. Financial support for the survey was provided by USAID through PMI, the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis, and Malaria, and the Government of Ghana.
Countless studies have shown that breast milk is beneficial to an infant’s growth and development during the first year of life. This year’s theme for World Breastfeeding Week from the WHO and World Alliance for Breastfeeding Action highlights the importance of supporting breastfeeding with skilled breastfeeding counseling.
The DHS Program has collected data for more than 30 years about initial breastfeeding, breastfeeding status and frequency, and the median duration of breastfeeding. Additionally, the Service Provision Assessment (SPA) provides insight on the overall readiness of health facilities to promote and support early breastfeeding as part of the antenatal care and newborn services package. Putting the baby to the breast within one hour of birth ensures that the infant receives the colostrum or “first milk” which contains antibodies to protect against infectious diseases and lipids to promote weight gain. Choosing to breastfeed exclusively for at least six months provides natural, renewable, and free food that does not require preparation or packaging.
In 2019, The DHS Program authored a study, Examining theRole of Health Facilities in Supporting Early Breastfeeding in Haiti and Malawi, about the relationship between the breastfeeding-related health service environment during antenatal care (ANC) and early initiation of breastfeeding. Using data from recent SPA surveys in Haiti and Malawi, three variables related to the health service environment are defined: availability of facilities with ANC services that report routine counseling on breastfeeding, provider training on breastfeeding, and observation of breastfeeding counseling during ANC and client’s report of breastfeeding counseling.
In Haiti, nearly all ANC facilities in both urban and rural areas report routine breastfeeding counseling during ANC, while 29% of urban and 26% of rural ANC providers received recent training in breastfeeding or infant and young child feeding (IYCF). Among urban and rural clients, 4% received counseling on breastfeeding.
The results of the analysis show that over 95% of facilities in both urban and rural areas of Haiti and Malawi report that breastfeeding counseling is provided. However, 26% to 40% of providers have received training in counseling on breastfeeding in the two years before the surveys, and only 4% to 10% of clients have received counseling. Analysis of linked SPA and DHS data show that having more providers recently trained on breastfeeding is significantly associated with increased odds of early breastfeeding among ANC clients in urban areas of Haiti and Malawi.
In Malawi, nearly all ANC facilities in both urban and rural areas report routine breastfeeding counseling during ANC, while 40% of both urban and rural ANC providers received recent training in breastfeeding or IYCF. Only 10% of urban clients and 4% of rural clients received counseling on breastfeeding.
This study clearly defines the role health institutions can play in promoting breastfeeding by providing support and education to new mothers and their families. By doing so health institutions can enable mothers to exclusively breastfeed for the first six months of life to ensure optimal growth, health, and development.
The DHS Program’s analysis team uses DHS data to explore topics related to global health, demography, and social epidemiology. Since our last update, the analysis team has used DHS data to explore the following questions:
How have the sexual and reproductive health behaviors among young women age 15-24 in the Philippines changed over time? From 2008-2017, women’s correct knowledge of their fertile period decreased. Regions with relatively high levels of unions and fertility, but relatively low levels of contraceptive use and demand satisfied are identified in Trends of Sexual and Reproductive Health Behaviors among Youth in the Philippines.
A series of Further Analysis reports uses DHS data to shed light on women’s empowerment in Pakistan:
Which factors influence early initiation of breastfeeding? Exploring DHS data from 31 countries with DHS surveys since 2015, Initiation of Breastfeeding in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Time-to-Event Analysis finds that the mean and median time to initiation of breastfeeding by hour is much greater for births delivered by Cesarean section, compared with births delivered vaginally. Immediate skin-to-skin contact and higher parity are significantly associated with shorter time to initiation.
A series of Further Analysis reports uses DHS data from surveys in Mali:
July 11th is World Population Day. This year’s UNFPA theme, Putting the brakes on COVID-19, is focused on safeguarding the health of women and girls during the pandemic. World Population Day is an opportunity to pause and reflect on how women are uniquely affected by the COVID-19 crisis:
Women make up the largest share of frontline health workers, so they are disproportionately exposed to the novel coronavirus.
Disrupted supply chains impact women’s access to modern contraceptives, which can result in unintended pregnancies.
Staying home to prevent the spread of COVID-19 puts already vulnerable women at a heightened risk of violence. In addition, gender-based violence prevention and protection efforts, social services, and care have been reduced during the pandemic.
The pandemic creates additional barriers to people who are pregnant to access antenatal care and safe-delivery services.
With the disruption of schools and community-based services, adolescents and young people may struggle to access information and services related to sexual and reproductive health.
A population pyramid is a great visualization of a country’s distribution of age groups by sex. Take The DHS Program’s #PopPyramid Quiz to test your knowledge of population pyramids from recently published Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS) and learn more about DHS indicators related to COVID-19 prevention.
As health systems and programs are increasingly managed at subnational levels (regions, states, or counties), DHS data are frequently available at smaller geographic units. For instance, the 2018 Nigeria DHS provides estimates at the national level, by urban-rural residence, and for 6 zones and 36 states and the Federal Capital Territory (FCT). There is an increased demand for subnational dissemination activities to present DHS survey findings to local stakeholders to encourage data use in program design, evaluation, and research at the local level. To train communicators on survey dissemination to local program managers, The DHS Program developed a ‘Communicating DHS Data at the National and State Levels’ workshop.
The capacity strengthening training was piloted with the 2016 Kenya DHS, the first Kenya DHS survey to collect data at the county level. The workshop was then formalized into a five-day training, different versions of which have now been implemented in Tanzania, Malawi, Myanmar, Mali, Philippines, Uganda, and Haiti.
On November 5, 2019, more than 300 people attended the official launch of the 2018 Nigeria Demographic and Health Survey (NDHS) in Abuja. Following the national seminar, The DHS Program Dissemination team trained teams from the survey implementing agencies, the National Population Commission (NPC) and National Malaria Elimination Programme (NMEP). Participants learned about dissemination, data use, and data visualization best practices and developed data use activities and presentations with state-level data.
From November to December 2019, the NPC and NMEP teams facilitated state-level data use workshops in each of Nigeria’s 36 states and the FCT. The audience included government officials (Governors’ representatives, Deputy Governors, State Public Health Directors), state-level representatives from UNICEF and WHO, traditional leaders, academia, and others. NPC and NMEP officials trained state-level data users on how to read the tables in the 2018 NDHS final report, demonstrated STATcompiler and The DHS Program mobile app, and facilitated locally relevant discussions about using the 2018 NDHS state-level findings to inform evidence-based programs and policies.
During the Jigawa state dissemination workshop, Governor Mohammed Badaru Abubakar of Jigawa state called for action, “this report can also be used for planning purposes in our ministries, departments, boards and parastatals as well as other relevant agencies in Jigawa state.” The Federal Commissioner for NPC in Anambra state, where 53% of ever-married women age 15-49 have experienced physical, sexual, or emotional spousal violence, said that the 2018 NDHS would be used for “proper planning for sustainable development.”
Thanks to the hard work of the NPC and NMEP dissemination teams, more than 5,000 people attended dissemination workshops in their states and learned the 2018 NDHS findings first-hand.
See here for the latest update on The DHS Program fieldwork activities during COVID-19.
In October 2019, The DHS Program welcomed visitors from Cameroon who came to the office to finalize the report for the 2018 Cameroon DHS. This post is one in a series of interviews with visitors to DHS headquarters.
Don’t read French? You can use the translate feature at the top of the page!
(English speakers: You may need to set the language to French first, before you can see the English lanugage option.)
Nom, titre et
organisation : Anaclet
Désiré DZOSSA, Chef de Division des Statistiques Démographiques à l’Institut
National de la Statistique (INS) ; Paul Roger LIBITE, Chef de Département
des Statistiques Démographiques et Sociales, INS
peu de la première fois que vous avez travaillé sur des données du « The
DHS Program » :
DZOSSA : C’était en 2004 lorsque j’ai participé pour
la première fois à l’analyse des données de l’Enquête Démographique et de Santé
du Cameroun (l’EDSC-III). J’ai été émerveillé, par curiosité lors de ces
travaux en 2004, de voir les données et rapports des autres pays aussi.
LIBITE : Il y a presque 27 ans en 1992, j’avais eu
la charge d’analyser les résultats de l’Enquête Démographique et de Santé du
Cameroun de 1991. J’avais reçu les tableaux de 7 chapitres et c’est moi qui
étais chargé de préparer les drafts qui devraient être par la suite enrichis
par mes supérieurs hiérarchiques. Moi je n’étais que jeune cadre.
Quel est votre
chapitre ou indicateur préféré, et pourquoi ?
DZOSSA : L’indicateur de niveau de bien-être
économique parce qu’il résume plusieurs aspects des caractéristiques
sociodémographiques et des conditions de vie des populations.
Quel est le
problème de population ou de santé qui vous intéresse le plus, et
LIBITE : De ma part, ma formation et mes
fonctions, c’est difficile de faire un choix. Tous les problèmes sont politiquement
préoccupants et comportent chacun un intérêt scientifique pertinent. Je suis
prêt à travailler sur n’importe quelle thématique.
espérez-vous que les données de l’EDS sur votre pays soient utilisées ?
DZOSSA : J’espère que cela sera effectivement utilisé
pour évaluer les politiques et stratégies mises en œuvre, et réorienter au
besoin celles qui devraient l’être pour le bien-être des populations.
appris en travaillant avec « The DHS Program » ?
LIBITE : Au-delà de la formation universitaire,
c’est en travaillant avec le programme DHS que j’ai compris comment mettre en
pratique les connaissances académiques. C’est une valeur ajoutée très
importante. Dans les universités et les écoles de formation, les cours sont
généralement très théoriques, et après la fin des études supérieures, il peut
arriver que l’on soit affecté à des tâches purement administratives qui ne
donnent pas l’opportunité de mettre en pratique les connaissances accumulées.
De plus, avec le programme DHS, il faut rester éveillé sur les évolutions
méthodologiques et scientifiques.
L’Enquête Démographique et de Santé 2018 de la République du Cameroun a été publiée le 10 juin 2020. Téléchargez le rapport final, la base de données et autres documents ici.
Anthropometry measurement (height and weight) is a core component of DHS surveys that is used to generate indicators on nutritional status. The Biomarker Questionnaire now includes questions on clothing and hairstyle interference on measurements for both women and children for improved interpretation.